Analysis of V. Bykov’s story “Obelisk”
The story “Obelisk” was first published in 1972 and immediately caused a flow of letters, leading to a discussion that unfolded in the press.
It was about the moral side of the action of the hero of the story, Ales Morozov; one of the participants in the discussion viewed it as a feat, others as a rash decision. The discussion allowed us to penetrate into the very essence of heroism as an ideological and moral concept, and made it possible to comprehend the variety of manifestations of the heroic not only during the war, but also in peacetime. The content of the work is not limited to turning to the past. In the story, the writer seeks to consider in its entirety the fates of those who died in the war, and those who survived, but continue to feel like fighters. A fighter for justice, for restoring the names and feats of the dead.
The story is permeated with Bykov’s characteristic atmosphere of reflection. The author is strict with himself and his generation, because the feat of the war period for him is the main measure of civic value and a modern person.
At first glance, the teacher did not accomplish the feat. During the war he did not kill a single fascist. He worked under the occupiers and taught children at school, as before the war. But this is only at first glance. The teacher appeared to the Nazis when they arrested five of his students and demanded his arrival. This is the feat. True, in the story itself the author does not give a clear answer to this question. He simply introduces two political positions: Ksendzov and Tkachuk. Ksendzov is precisely convinced that there was no feat, that the teacher Moroz was not a hero and, therefore, in vain his student Pavel Miklashevich, who miraculously escaped in those days of arrests and executions, spent almost the rest of his life ensuring that the name of Moroz was imprinted on obelisk above the names of the five dead students.
The dispute between Ksendzov and the former partisan commissar Tkachuk flared up on the day of the funeral of Miklashevich, who, like Moroz, taught in a rural school and by this alone proved his loyalty to the memory of Ales Ivanovich.
People like Ksendzov have quite reasonable arguments against Moroz: after all, it turns out that he himself went to the German commandant’s office and got a school opened. But Commissioner Tkachut knows more: he delved into the moral side of Moroz’s act. “If we don’t teach, they will fool us” - this is a principle that is clear to the teacher, which is also clear to Tkachuk, who was sent from the partisan detachment to listen to Moroz’s explanations. Both of them learned the truth: the struggle for the souls of teenagers continues during the occupation.
Teacher Moroz waged this struggle until his very last hour. He understood that the Nazis’ promise to release the children who sabotaged the road if their teacher appeared was a lie. But he had no doubt about anything else: if he didn’t show up, his enemies would use this fact against him and discredit everything he taught the children.
And he went to certain death. He knew that everyone would be executed—him and the boys. And such was the moral strength of his feat that Pavlik Miklashevich, the only survivor of these guys, carried the ideas of his teacher through all the trials of life. Having become a teacher, he passed on Morozov’s “leaven” to his students. Tkachuk, having learned that one of them, Vitka, had recently helped catch a bandit, remarked with satisfaction: “I knew it. Miklashevich knew how to teach. There’s also that sourdough, you can see right away.”
The story outlines the paths of three generations: Moroz, Miklashevich, Vitka. Each of them fulfills his heroic path with dignity, not always clearly visible, not always recognized by everyone.
The writer makes you think about the meaning of heroism and a feat that is not similar to the usual one, helps you understand the moral origins of a heroic act. Before Moroz, when he went from a partisan detachment to the fascist commandant’s office, before Miklashevich, when he sought the rehabilitation of his teacher, before Vitka, when he rushed to protect the girl, there was the possibility of choice. The possibility of formal justification did not suit them. Each of them acted, guided by the judgment of their own conscience. A person like Ksendzov would most likely prefer to eliminate himself.
The dispute that takes place in the story “Obelisk” helps to understand the continuity of heroism, selflessness, and true kindness.
Essay on the topic: Moral feat in V. Bykov’s story “Obelisk”
_________________________________________________________________________________________________ Composition. Moral feat in V. Bykov’s story “Obelisk”
Vasil Bykov is the author of many books about the Great Patriotic War. He himself was a participant in the war at eighteen years old. There was a military school, there was a front. First infantry, then destroyer anti-tank artillery. Like Vasily Terkin from the poem by Alexander Tvardovsky, he experienced everything that a soldier was supposed to experience: he was wounded, he was missing in action, even his name remained on one of the mass graves of those years. And knowing all this, you are no longer surprised how this writer managed to so vividly convey the difficult wartime, to show a person and his inner world in such very difficult life situations. The story “Obelisk” is one of Bykov’s immortal works, which touches on the problem of continuity of generations, the inextricable connection of times, and loyalty to the traditions of fathers and grandfathers. The writer raises a serious problematic question: what can be considered a feat, are we not narrowing this concept, calculating it only by the number of downed planes, blown up tanks, destroyed enemies? Is the action of the village teacher Ales Ivanovich Moroz a feat? The author shows Ales Moroz as an extraordinary, modest person unlike others. This rural teacher could shelter a boy whose father treated him cruelly, without fear of scandal and a summons to court, could read Tolstoy with the children for hours in order to teach them to listen and understand the beautiful, and not talk about the errors of the classics, as the school curriculum recommended . “And Moroz did not stir up Tolstoy’s misconceptions - he simply read to the students and absorbed everything completely into himself, absorbed it with his soul. A sensitive soul, she will perfectly understand on her own what is good and what is so-so. The good will enter into it as if it were its own, and the rest will quickly be forgotten. The grain will be blown away like chaff in the wind. Now I understand this perfectly, but then well... I was young, and also a boss,” Timofey Tkachuk, an old partisan who was the head of the district before the war, tells the author. This man only realized many years later that the most important thing for a teacher was not his knowledge base, but what his students would become. The writer builds his work on the dispute between Ksendzov and Tkachuk. Ksendzov claims that Moroz did not perform any feat, that he is not a hero and, therefore, in vain his student Pavel Miklashevich, who miraculously escaped during the days of arrests and executions, spent almost the rest of his life ensuring that Moroz’s name was imprinted on the obelisk above the names five dead students. Ksendzov says that Moroz did not kill a single German, did not do anything useful for the partisan detachment, in which he spent only a short time. In addition, he worked under the occupiers, teaching children at school, as before the war. But Moroz himself directly and frankly told Tkachuk: “If you mean my current teaching, then leave your doubts. I won't teach you anything bad. And school is necessary. If we don’t teach, they will fool you. And I didn’t humanize these guys for two years only to have them now dehumanized. I will still fight for them. As much as I can, of course.” These words of Ales Ivanovich turned out to be prophetic. He truly did everything he could for his students. The struggle for the souls of teenagers continued during the occupation. Teacher Moroz waged this struggle until his very last hour. Undoubtedly, he understood that the Nazis’ promise to release the guys who sabotaged the road in order to kill the local policeman if their teacher appeared was a lie. But he also had no doubt about something else: if he didn’t show up, his enemies would use this fact against him and discredit everything he taught the children. And at night Ales Ivanovich leaves the partisan detachment to share their terrible fate with his students. He goes to certain death, knowing that everyone will be executed - both him and the guys, but the teacher cannot do otherwise. And such was the moral strength of his feat that Pavlik Miklashevich, the only survivor of these guys, carried the ideas of his teacher throughout his life. Having become a teacher, he passed on Morozov’s “leaven” to his students, and Tkachuk, having learned that one of them, Vitka, had recently helped catch a bandit, remarked with satisfaction: “I knew it. Miklashevich knew how to teach. There’s also that sourdough, you can see right away.” The whole world knows about the feat of the Polish teacher Janusz Korczak, who died in a gas chamber along with his students, leaving no children, despite the offer of a fascist officer. How many teachers died, remaining unknown to the world? In the story “Obelisk,” the writer makes you think about the meaning of heroism and feat, helps to delve into the moral origins of a heroic act. V. Bykov created many works on the theme of war, thereby erecting his own literary obelisks to the heroes of the Fatherland: “This obelisk, slightly taller than human height, in the ten years that I remembered it, changed its color several times: it was snow-white, bleached before the holidays with lime, then green, to match the color of the soldier’s uniform; One day, driving along this highway, I saw it shiny silver, like the wing of a jetliner. Now he was gray, and, perhaps, of all the other colors, this one most suited his appearance.” .
Essay Analysis based on Bykov's story Obelisk
V. Bykov’s story “Obelisk” is a very difficult work about the war, which, however, will not leave anyone indifferent. And, despite its “heaviness,” I want to re-read it from time to time. If only to remind ourselves that there are heroes, there are people like Ales Moroz. That the memory of them and their exploits should live forever.
Frost lived for the sake of others, for the sake of children. He didn't need anything for himself. A lot can be said at least by the fact that he bought new shoes for two twin girls and organized their escort from school - he went himself or sent one of the guys. This is because their mother forbade them to go to school with the onset of winter - the path was difficult and quite dangerous.
This is the kind of person Ales Moroz was. He did not live for himself - and died to save others. He died recklessly - knowing that by going to the enemy’s camp, he would not only not save the captured guys, but would also destroy himself. Although here one can speculate on the topic that a person like Moroz simply could not stand it if he survived, but his pupils did not. Knowing that the Germans promised to release the guys if their “leader,” their teacher, came to them, he would have cursed himself for the rest of his life for not taking advantage of this chance. And he couldn’t help but use it. Could not.
Of all his captured pupils, only Pavel Miklashevich survived, who later also became a school teacher and gave his life to ensure that people knew the truth about this story. But the war also “held him in its claws” - so much so that he was never able to escape from these claws. His health did not recover, he died young - at 36 years old. Through his efforts, a monument to the victims of this tragedy was erected - the same obelisk from the title of the story.
As time passed, there were people who said that there were worse heroes than Frost, that he died recklessly. Even the fact that he did not kill a single German - and therefore cannot be considered a hero. Here it is - depreciation in all its glory. However, many people don’t even think about what they are talking about - everything is simply clear to them in advance. Their worldview is firm and immovable. Everything that happens around is seen only through the prism of their beliefs. Everything is adjusted to certain limits, beyond which they simply do not look. Good people, honest. Only the soulless ones.
Essay on the story Obelisk
The storyline of the work is built from the narration of the narrator, a journalist, who collects information about unknown war heroes who committed inglorious feats in the name of defending their homeland.
The main character of the story is Ales Moroz, presented by the writer in the image of a teacher who, during the period of hostilities, unselfishly and devotedly teaches children, helping them to the best of his ability in the form of clothes, shoes, standing up for playful children before the wrath of their fathers, protecting them from severe punishment.
During the war, the teacher tries to track reports from the front line and distributes them among local residents in order to truthfully inform citizens about the real state of the military disposition, the actual victories of the Soviet army, as well as maintaining faith among fellow villagers in the victory over Nazi troops and the imminent liberation of their native land.
One day, several of Ales Moroz’s students find themselves arrested by fascist invaders, and the teacher comes to the Germans to protect innocently captured children in the hope of their release. However, despite the heroism and courage shown in front of the invaders, Ales Moroz fails to save the children, and he and five students are sentenced to hang.
At the end of the war, in the village where teacher Ales Moroz taught and died, a monumental monument was erected, on which, among other heroes of the homeland, the name of an ordinary teacher is listed, who became an example of courage, professionalism, bravery, bravery, and patriotism.
The work is full of the author’s reflections on the topic of the hero’s actions in the story, from the point of view of ideological and moral concepts, as well as the civic position of a representative of modern society in emergency conditions. The writer examines the teacher’s act from a variety of positions, demonstrating in the narrative his own understanding of heroism, which consists of loyalty and devotion to one’s own profession, fighting for the mental state and future of children, guided by the demands of human conscience, realizing one’s imminent terrible death.
The story demonstrates the real meaning of the heroic act of the teacher, which is considered by some people to be a rash action, which differs from the usual understanding of the feat, expressed in mortal battles with the enemy, revealing the moral foundations of the actions of an ordinary Russian person.
Also read:
Picture for the essay Analysis of the story Obelisk
Popular topics today
The hero of I. A. Goncharov’s novel “Oblomov,” Andrei Ivanovich Stolts, is a rather interesting person. As he himself admitted, work is the image, content, element and purpose of his life
One of the minor characters in the work is General Yakov Mikhailovich Anosov, a longtime friend of the Tuganovsky family.
One of the main characters of the work is Pirogov, presented by the writer in the image of a friendly and sympathetic doctor, the prototype of the famous surgeon Nikolai Ivanovich Pirogov.
The novel "Doctor Zhivago" is one of the literary masterpieces of the 20th century. For writing the novel, which he laboriously worked on for ten years, Pasternak received the Nobel Prize in Literature.
In Ivan Turgenev's story "The Singers", the narrator finds himself in a village in which two local artists are competing. It shows ordinary peasant life, uniquely connected with art.
V. V. Bykov “Obelisk”: analysis, summary
The story “Obelisk” by Vasily Bykov is a historically immortal work of the writer.
It adds to the list of heavy works about war that cannot go unnoticed. The story reflects loyalty to traditions, patriotism, as well as continuity of generations. As we read, we observe the author's reflections on the ideological morality of human actions.
The main idea of the plot was a reflection of the actions of the main character of the story, examined by the writer from all sides. This expresses the author's awareness of the manifestation of heroism, which, as he believes, lies in devotion to one's own cause, while placing emphasis on the coming generation.
The storyline is distinguished by its artistic originality because, in addition to the writer’s story, it includes a reflection of journalistic activity in the form of collecting information about unknown war heroes who committed a feat that was not reflected anywhere in the name of their Motherland and the happiness of subsequent generations.
Ales Ivanovich Moroz is the main character of the story, whom the author shows in the role of a rural teacher. He is devoted to his own profession as a man who had a reputation for honesty, kindness, and mercy of character. The teacher did not give up teaching and continued teaching children, even after the start of the war. Whenever possible, the hero helped the children, distributing clothes and shoes. Having learned that his students were in fascist captivity, the teacher without hesitation went to the enemy’s headquarters to protect the children. After all, it’s not his style to abandon defenseless children to their mercy. However, Moroz's heroism was unsuccessful, the teacher and students were sentenced to death by hanging.
Another of the main characters is presented to us with the image of the seriously wounded Miklashevich Pavel. He was a student of Ales Ivanovich, who influenced the formation of the guy’s character. During the war, Pavel will become a member of a partisan detachment. During a meeting with a journalist, the hero will tell about his former teacher. Over time, Pavel will follow in the footsteps of Moroz and become a teacher at a rural school. In his stories, he periodically mentioned the nightmares of the war.
Also mentioned in the story was the name of Kolya Borodich, who was the oldest teenager and the most faithful follower of his teacher Moroz.
At the end of the war, in memory of heroism and courage, professionalism, and patriotism of the Russian spirit, an obelisk was erected at the site of the death of the teacher and students.
Analysis of the essay of the story Obelisk Bykov
“Obelisk” is a historically immortal story by Vasil Bykov. The work touches on the global theme of continuity of generations, loyalty to the traditions of the father and grandfather.
From the very beginning of the story, the main theme is revealed - contemporaries’ respect for front-line soldiers, reading their memory. The story is told by a journalist who never met a person who went through the war.
The narrator wants to restore justice and tells the story of the teacher Ales Moroz. He remains faithful and devoted to his profession until the very end. During the war years, this teacher helped children, dressed them, put shoes on them, and stood up for the boys before their strict fathers. Throughout the war, he distributed information bureau reports among local citizens. The teacher was captured by the Germans to save his students, but was hanged along with them. Historical justice has been restored in the story. The name of the teacher Ales Moroz and at the same time a war hero is written on the obelisk in the village of Seltso.
The writer filled the entire story with an atmosphere of reflection. The moral side of the protagonist's action was brought up for discussion after the first publication. His action was viewed as a feat, and at the same time, as a rash action.
Heroism is an ideological and moral concept that makes it possible to understand the manifestations of man in peacetime and war years.
Essay based on the story by Bykov Obelisk
The story itself was completed in 1971, but the first copy was published only in 1972. And he was immediately subjected to strong criticism. This criticism developed over the moral character of the main character Ales Moroz. “Obelisk” is a historical story with a strong focus on military themes. The story touches on the eternal theme of conflicts, relationships between different generations, and observance of the traditions of the older generation. Reflections told in the story about the events of the distant past are needed to form the moral character of new generations.
From the first lines, Vasily Bykov talks about the attitude of people of that time to the memory of fallen front-line soldiers. The narration is narrated by a journalist, he was looking for a meeting with participants in the hostilities. But I never managed to communicate with such people. The journalist strives to restore justice and tells the story of his mentor, teacher Ales Moroz, who remained faithful to his profession until the last. During the war years, he selflessly helped the children of that time with everything: decoration, shoes, education, and in every possible way defended the children from the ardent temper of their fathers.
During the hostilities, he reviewed all events and reported them to all his compatriots. But due to circumstances unfavorable for him, he was overrun by the Germans. Ales Moroz heroically defended his students, but was defeated and was hanged along with them.
The story reproduces general historical reality. At the end of all hostilities, a monument was erected in the village of Seltse. And the name of the teacher, mentor and jointly war hero Ales Moroz is also present there.
V. Bykov’s story “Obelisk” is filled with thoughts and reasoning. The ethical component of Ales Moroz’s actions was subjected to rapid discounting. His actions were considered heroic and at the same time as imprudent actions.
Years fly by, but the thought of determination and courage in the name of the Motherland lives in this story. This flourishes in the elderly, in the “children of war”, who gave life and raised a new generation to their feet, and showed all that courage and devotion to the Motherland. Heroism is described - the ability to accomplish a feat, to go beyond one’s capabilities in peace and war.
Analysis of the story Obelisk Bykov
Several interesting essays
Sancho Panza was Don Quixote's assistant and squire, he was a devoted friend and a good helper. He was a simple peasant and landowner, who was attracted a little by the particular stories of Don Quixote
The artist Aivazovsky comes from the family of an Armenian entrepreneur who lived in Feodosia at that time. A talented child was born on July 17, 1817. Subsequently, the family went bankrupt.
“The Little Match Girl” is the famous Christmas story by H.H. Andersen. The main character of the story is a little beggar girl who is forced to sell matches on the night before New Year. Her family was extremely poor
The people in the novel are not only ordinary soldiers, mostly serfs. The people are also people of the rich classes of Rostov and Bolkonsky. The people here are interpreted as a nation. The people have always been the driving force of history.
The street of my childhood will be remembered for the rest of my life. I still live on it, but I can say with confidence that even when I leave and live very far away, I will remember it as if I see it with my own eyes, right now.
Analysis of the essay of the story Obelisk Bykov
“Obelisk” is a historically immortal story by Vasil Bykov. The work touches on the global theme of continuity of generations, loyalty to the traditions of the father and grandfather.
From the very beginning of the story, the main theme is revealed - contemporaries’ respect for front-line soldiers, reading their memory. The story is told by a journalist who never met a person who went through the war.
The narrator wants to restore justice and tells the story of the teacher Ales Moroz. He remains faithful and devoted to his profession until the very end. During the war years, this teacher helped children, dressed them, put shoes on them, and stood up for the boys before their strict fathers.
Throughout the war, he distributed information bureau reports among local citizens. The teacher was captured by the Germans to save his students, but was hanged along with them. Historical justice has been restored in the story.
The name of the teacher Ales Moroz and at the same time a war hero is written on the obelisk in the village of Seltso.
The writer filled the entire story with an atmosphere of reflection. The moral side of the protagonist's action was brought up for discussion after the first publication. His action was viewed as a feat, and at the same time, as a rash action.
Heroism is an ideological and moral concept that makes it possible to understand the manifestations of man in peacetime and war years.
Essay based on the story by Bykov Obelisk
The story itself was completed in 1971, but the first copy was published only in 1972. And he was immediately subjected to strong criticism. This criticism developed over the moral character of the main character Ales Moroz. “Obelisk” is a historical story with a strong focus on military themes. The story touches on the eternal theme of conflicts, relationships between different generations, and observance of the traditions of the older generation.
Reflections told in the story about the events of the distant past are needed to form the moral character of new generations.
From the first lines, Vasily Bykov talks about the attitude of people of that time to the memory of fallen front-line soldiers. The story is narrated by a journalist, he was looking for a meeting with participants in the hostilities. But I never managed to communicate with such people.
The journalist strives to restore justice and tells the story of his mentor, teacher Ales Moroz, who remained faithful to his profession until the last. During the war years, he selflessly helped the children of that time with everything: decoration, shoes, education, and in every possible way protected the children from the ardent temper of their fathers.
During the hostilities, he reviewed all events and reported to all his compatriots. But due to circumstances unfavorable for him, he was filled with Germans. Ales Moroz heroically defended his students, but was defeated and was hanged along with them.
The story reproduces general historical reality. At the end of all hostilities, a monument was erected in the village of Seltse. And the name of the teacher, mentor and jointly war hero Ales Moroz is also present there.
V. Bykov’s story “Obelisk” is filled with thoughts and reasoning. The ethical component of Ales Moroz’s actions was subjected to rapid discounting. His actions were considered heroic and at the same time as imprudent actions.
Years fly by, but the thought of determination and courage in the name of the Motherland lives in this story. This flourishes in the elderly, in the “children of war”, who gave life and raised a new generation to their feet, and showed all that courage and devotion to the Motherland. Heroism is described - the ability to accomplish a feat, to go beyond one’s capabilities in peace and war.
TV on the topic: Analysis of the essay of the story Obelisk Bykov
Essay on the story Obelisk
The storyline of the work is built from the narration of the narrator, a journalist, who collects information about unknown war heroes who committed inglorious feats in the name of defending their homeland.
The main character of the story is Ales Moroz, presented by the writer in the image of a teacher who, during the period of hostilities, unselfishly and devotedly teaches children, helping them to the best of his ability in the form of clothes, shoes, standing up for playful children before the wrath of their fathers, protecting them from severe punishment.
During the war, the teacher tries to track reports from the front line and distributes them among local residents in order to truthfully inform citizens about the real state of the military disposition, the actual victories of the Soviet army, as well as maintaining faith among fellow villagers in the victory over Nazi troops and the imminent liberation of their native land.
One day, several of Ales Moroz’s students find themselves arrested by fascist invaders, and the teacher comes to the Germans to protect innocently captured children in the hope of their release. However, despite the heroism and courage shown in front of the invaders, Ales Moroz fails to save the children, and he and five students are sentenced to hang.
At the end of the war, in the village where teacher Ales Moroz taught and died, a monumental monument was erected, on which, among other heroes of the homeland, the name of an ordinary teacher is listed, who became an example of courage, professionalism, bravery, bravery, and patriotism.
The story demonstrates the real meaning of the heroic act of the teacher, which is considered by some people to be a rash action, which differs from the usual understanding of the feat, expressed in mortal battles with the enemy, revealing the moral foundations of the actions of an ordinary Russian person.
Analysis of V. Bykov’s story “Obelisk”
The story “Obelisk” was first published in 1972 and immediately caused a flow of letters, leading to a discussion that unfolded in the press. It was about the moral side of the action of the hero of the story, Ales Morozov; one of the participants in the discussion viewed it as a feat, others as a rash decision. The discussion allowed us to penetrate into the very essence of heroism as an ideological and moral concept, and made it possible to comprehend the variety of manifestations of the heroic not only during the war, but also in peacetime.
The content of the work is not limited to turning to the past. In the story, the writer seeks to consider in its entirety the fates of those who died in the war, and those who survived, but continue to feel like fighters. A fighter for justice, for restoring the names and feats of the dead.
The story is permeated with Bykov’s characteristic atmosphere of reflection. The author is strict with himself and his generation, because the feat of the war period for him is the main measure of civic value and a modern person.
At first glance, the teacher did not accomplish the feat. During the war he did not kill a single fascist. He worked under the occupiers and taught children at school, as before the war. But this is only at first glance. The teacher appeared to the Nazis when they arrested five of his students and demanded his arrival. This is the feat. True, in the story itself the author does not give a clear answer to this question. He simply introduces two political positions: Ksendzov and Tkachuk. Ksendzov is precisely convinced that there was no feat, that the teacher Moroz was not a hero and, therefore, in vain his student Pavel Miklashevich, who miraculously escaped in those days of arrests and executions, spent almost the rest of his life ensuring that the name of Moroz was imprinted on obelisk above the names of the five dead students.
The dispute between Ksendzov and the former partisan commissar Tkachuk flared up on the day of the funeral of Miklashevich, who, like Moroz, taught in a rural school and by this alone proved his loyalty to the memory of Ales Ivanovich.
People like Ksendzov have quite reasonable arguments against Moroz: after all, it turns out that he himself went to the German commandant’s office and got a school opened. But Commissioner Tkachut knows more: he delved into the moral side of Moroz’s act. “If we don’t teach, they will fool us” - this is a principle that is clear to the teacher, which is also clear to Tkachuk, who was sent from the partisan detachment to listen to Moroz’s explanations. Both of them learned the truth: the struggle for the souls of teenagers continues during the occupation.
Teacher Moroz waged this struggle until his very last hour. He understood that the Nazis’ promise to release the children who sabotaged the road if their teacher appeared was a lie. But he had no doubt about anything else: if he didn’t show up, his enemies would use this fact against him and discredit everything he taught the children.
And he went to certain death. He knew that everyone would be executed—him and the boys. And such was the moral strength of his feat that Pavlik Miklashevich, the only survivor of these guys, carried the ideas of his teacher through all the trials of life. Having become a teacher, he passed on Morozov’s “leaven” to his students. Tkachuk, having learned that one of them, Vitka, had recently helped catch a bandit, remarked with satisfaction: “I knew it. Miklashevich knew how to teach. There’s also that sourdough, you can see right away.”
The story outlines the paths of three generations: Moroz, Miklashevich, Vitka. Each of them fulfills his heroic path with dignity, not always clearly visible, not always recognized by everyone.
The writer makes you think about the meaning of heroism and a feat that is not similar to the usual one, helps you understand the moral origins of a heroic act. Before Moroz, when he went from a partisan detachment to the fascist commandant’s office, before Miklashevich, when he sought the rehabilitation of his teacher, before Vitka, when he rushed to protect the girl, there was the possibility of choice. The possibility of formal justification did not suit them. Each of them acted, guided by the judgment of their own conscience. A person like Ksendzov would most likely prefer to eliminate himself.
The dispute that takes place in the story “Obelisk” helps to understand the continuity of heroism, selflessness, and true kindness.
